Employers have significant control over the data of their employees. To protect employees, the workers' councils often completely forbid usage of individual-related data by employers. This is not a perfect solution though. On the one hand, nobody can truly verify that managers adhere to this (more often than not, they probably don't). On the other hand, interesting data usages might be prevented, even if employees are in principle okay with it.
Inverse Transparency is a concept that we think can help overcome these hurdles. It is based on a simple principle: All data is accessible, but all data access is transparent and visible to the data owners. This makes misusage unattractive, as it can be retraced. Valuable and interesting data usages on the other hand are enabled in a transparent way.
There will be two seminar meetings over the course of the semester, and a 1–2 day block for the seminar itself (presentations). The exact dates will be announced in a timely manner.
This seminar covers a broad range of topics related to how Inverse Transparency could be implemented. We have defined topics from different domains and for different levels of skill. Accordingly, we can offer interesting topics for Bachelor's as well as Master's students.
All topics will be introduced and assigned in our first meeting. If you have another interesting topic in mind that is related to Inverse Transparency, you may suggest it as an additional topic then.
A selection of the topics offered can be found in the slides of the introductory meeting.
Students will survey the literature of one of the research topics assigned to them by their supervisors; they are encouraged to find and read further relevant articles on the topic. At the end of the seminar, students are to submit an exposé that incorporates the knowledge they acquired and the findings of any experiments they conducted whilst researching the topic. The exposé depicts a scientific paper that adopts their own succinct chain of argumentation. Merely paraphrasing and augmenting the contents of original papers is not sufficient.
In order to help students improve their submissions, we require an intermediate submission, as well as peer reviews and a revision of the final paper. All deliverables are listed below.
- An intermediate submission (2-page extended abstract)
- A final seminar paper written in conformance with the TUM student code of conduct
- Length: 6-10 pages, with a maximum allowed length of 15 pages
- Style: IEEE Transactions Style (2-column, conference format)
- All submissions must be PDF files.
- Peer reviews of 3 other papers (1-2 pages)
- A presentation of 15 minutes + participation in the discussions
- Plagiarism of any form (blatant copy-paste, summarizing someone else's ideas/results without reference etc.) will result in immediate expulsion from the course.
- All submissions are mandatory. Each submission must fulfill a certain level of quality. Submissions that are just collections of buzzword/keywords or coarse document structures will not be accepted. Failing that will be graded 5.0.
- Late submissions will invite penalties.
- Non-adherence to the submission guidelines will invite penalties.
- Participation and attendance in all seminar meetings is mandatory. Students must read the final submissions of their colleagues and participate in the discussions.